Was The Flash Crash Nothing More Than A Fast Market?

If you follow the stock market at all, you will no doubt have been aware of the events that occurred on the afternoon of May 6th, in what has now come to be known as the “Flash Crash”. This was the 1000-point drop and subsequent rally in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, all of which happened over a period of just 20 minutes. It was completely unprecedented; the market had never fallen so far so quickly before.

However, what exactly caused the crash is still something of a mystery. Nobody now believes the initial theory doing the rounds, that it was some fat-fingered trader entering a sell order of a billion shares instead of a million. There are too many pre-trade risk controls in place to allow something like that to happen these days. Besides, there was absolutely no evidence to support that theory.

Another theory is that it was a deliberate act by a hacker or a cyber-terrorist who  had access to one of the exchange’s matching engines, but again this theory doesn’t stand up to any kind of scrutiny.

The latest view on the flash crash, and the one that seems to be most likely according to the High Frequency Trading Review, is that a hedge fund sent a wave of sell orders came in to the CME’s e-mini S&P futures contract, which drove the price downwards. Because the markets were already nervous on the back of events unfolding in Greece on the back of the debt crisis there, the downward movement picked up momentum, stop loss orders were triggered creating a downward spiral and panic set in. As soon as traders realized there was no fundamental reason prices should have fallen so low, the market immediately rallied.

This kind of thing has happened before, but now that all of the markets operate on electronic trading systems, momentum can gather much more quickly now than it ever has in the past.

If this explanation is true, then hold on to your hat because this is probably not the last time you will see a “Flash Crash”. Expect more of the same as market technology gets faster.

Thinking of Starting a High-Frequency Trading Firm?

Although there seem to be more and more firms getting involved in high frequency trading these days, the big players in the market (i.e the Goldman Sachs & Credit Suisse’s of this world) remain the same. Having said that however, their share of the market does seem to be decreasing. The question is, does that mean there are growing opportunities for smaller firms to get into this market and compete?

At latest count, according to industry analysts, there are probably about 400 firms now engaged in high frequency trading (HFT). Amazingly, HFT activities now account for around 70% or total equity market volume in the US.

Many pundits are however wondering if those figures have topped out. Others are adamant that they are set to continue to grow. Like so many issues, the answer to the questions seems to depend on who you are asking.

Some industry spokespeople think that the market is now starting to become saturated with high-frequency traders. In the last year or so, there has been a whole raft of new high-frequency trading shops opening, but it seems that an equal number are just as quickly going out of business.

It’s a tough game. To compete with the big boys, you need expensive technology and incredibly complex computer algorithms. The big Wall Street firms have deep pockets. They can pay big bucks not just for the technology but also for the best brains in the business to come up with the engineering and the computer code behind that technology.

The opportunities for new firms who want a piece of the high frequency trading pie are thus limited (despite the fact that it is a very big pie).

Our advice to those looking to start a high frequency trading operation is this. Think long and hard about it and make sure you have good funding. Yes, it can be very profitable but to be successful you will have to compete at the highest levels and it won’t be cheap!

Algorithmic Trading – Who Are the Players?

Algorithmic Trading is increasingly being used by all kinds of firms in the financial markets. But who are the primary users of algorithmic trading strategies? Are they hedge funds? Institutional fund managers? And what about the Sell-Side? Who exactly are the players in this space?

On the Buy-Side, algorithmic trading technology is generally used more by hedge funds than by the more traditional asset management firms. Hedge funds use many strategies for investing, including pairs strategies, long/short, multi-asset and various quantitative methods. Some of these lend themselves more to algorithmic trading than traditional buy-and-hold for example.

Traditional asset managers and institutional fund managers do tend to be a little more conservative with their investment strategies and are maybe a little bit slower to make use of things like algo trading. But you also have to consider the order flow. When you look at hedge funds compared with asset managers, they are both seeking alpha, but hedge funds tend to seek it on a shorter-term, faster basis. Because they are opening and closing positions more rapidly, they also require faster access to the various liquidity destinations where they trade. So algorithmic trading plays a greater part in this kind of environment.

Having said that, the bigger fund managers are now playing catch-up and some of them are using algos a lot more than they were.

Of course, when it comes down to basics, all of these Buy-Side firms are out to create alpha and to provide a return on investment in some way or other. What’s changing is how they are going about it.

Markets are more volatile than they were, prices move more quickly and traders have to take account of that fact.

On the Sell-Side of course, brokers and service providers need to be able to offer their asset management and hedge fund clients the ability to trade quickly and to send them orders using the various types of algorithms they offer. That is their challenge.

For more information, listen to the Algorithmic Trading Podcast